Comparison between "Lord of the flies" and "Catcher in the rye".

Comparison Essay         The deuce books that I am canvass argon The catcher in the Rye, and Lord of the Flies. The two books are very evoke and are very opposite stock-still the same in many ways. In The Catcher in the Rye, Holden is an idealistic feature who becomes more of a realist as the invention progresses, while in the Lord of the Flies, many characters assume unalike roles. exactly the main(prenominal) argument between the two novels is that Holden has a stargaze antic of being the catcher in the rye whiskey. The catcher in the rye symbolizes that Holden is on an imaginary cliff, hard to keep the children from hunt down off. The rye symbolizes childhood and whiteness, but falling off would hateful falling into the phony world of adult-hood. Holden fates to keep the kids on the rye preserving their innocence. In the Lord of the Flies, the boys are stuck on an island without adult superintendence and speedily draw back their innocence, beco ming savages. dump is the attracter of the savages, and he is unendingly acting very wild and softheaded on the island. Jack yelled this quote a itemise of times, Kill the go through it! Cut his throat! Kill the pig! Bash him in! ( Golding 126).

The theme I am trying to connect, is it possible to stupefy innocent your whole life, or entrust everyone eventually lose their innocence?         In the Lord of the Flies, Ralph and neandertal are the two main characters trying to keep innocence on the island by trying to restore a classless island. Piggy tries to give his wisdom, while Ralph tries to use the little tycoon he has left. But i! n send to restore republic and innocence on the island they must compete with Jack, who is controlling the island by making everyone... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay