Briefing The Case

TITLELeegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v . PSKS , IncFACTSsupplicant Leegin Creative Leather Products , a manufacturer of women s accessories under the brand name Brighton , entered into a tumid stripped-down price agreements with its retailer , which includes herein respondent , PSKS , Inc . prayerer avers that much(prenominal) price agreements intend to encourage competition among retailers in the atomic number 18as of client service and product promotion . However , herein respondent discounted Leegin products below their prescribed minimum price . after cosmos dropped by Leegin as one of its retailers , PSKS d a causal agent , arguing that Leegin violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act by engaging in anticompetitive price fixing . The District solicit fixed in favor of PSKS citing Dr . Miles Medical Co . v . ma gic D . Park Sons Co , which held that authorization price agreements are per se unratified under the Sherman Act . suitor , in an appeal to the U .S .

Court of Appeals for the Fifth rope , argued that this chance was based on outdated economics and contended that a the recover of reason is a better legal compendium Petitioner further claimed that price minimums will only be held illegal when proven to be anticompetitive . The appellate court command in favor of the district court hence , this petition for certiorariISSUEIs it per se illegal for a manufacturer to passel mandatory minimum prices for its prod uctsRULENo , it is not illegal for a manufac! turer to set mandatory minimum prices for its products . Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits [e]very stuff , combination in...If you wish to get a full essay, dictate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay